SS: hubble has found another moon orbiting pluto .. in my etheric ice globes and radioactive core theory neither of nasa’s theories fit at all . according to my polestar sciences everything in the protostars planetary disk was etheric ice crystals and etheric globes with radioactive cores .. this was before polarization of the solar system .. if haumea and all the comets were tetrahedron etheric iceballs then all other moons and planets were also etheric ice balls .. the environment of the protoplanetary disc was cold except near the protostar where the ice melted into gas before entering into the star .. the planets with moons either already had them in orbit inside the protoplanetary disk or they captured them into orbit during the protostar ignition .. there was no splatting at all . any collisions left craters in the icy etheric shells and nothing more than this .

SS: nasa and i disagree with nasa’s “pluto smash up flung” theory these moons found their way orbiting pluto . nasa claims that pluto has moons because another planet collided with it and the “smashup flung” these moons to orbit pluto .. however, in nasa’s “lunar splat” theory they claim that a collision with our moon was a splat together into one bigger moon .. obviously these two nasa theories completely contradict each other which pretty well proves that nasa really doesn’t have a theory .. i consider nasa’s theory should be categorized as something else like a “cover theory” .. i am basically giving them benefit of the doubt that they know their theory is wrong .

SS: we need to study pluto more closely .. what kind of moon is it ?? there are many kinds of moons so determination of what the properties of pluto might help understand why it has so many other moons and or satellites orbiting it .. we cannot have both protostar objects colliding some shatter and some splat together . if nasa are deliberately lying to us well the problem with that is still truth or consequences .. they are multiples smaller than the martians and the martians failed . another problem is that being wrong causes catastrophes .

NASA’s Hubble Discovers Another Moon Around Pluto 07.20.11 The dwarf planet’s entire moon system is believed to have formed by a collision between Pluto and another planet-sized body early in the history of the solar system. The smashup flung material that coalesced into the family of satellites observed around Pluto.

This image, taken by the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, shows five moons orbiting the distant, icy dwarf planet Pluto. The green circle marks the newly discovered moon, designated S/2012 (134340) 1, or P5, as photographed by Hubble’s Wide Field Camera 3. (AFP Photo/NASA/ESA/HUBBLE)

FILE – In this file image provided by NASA Feb. 22, 2006 from NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope shows Pluto and three of it’s moons. A team of scientists using the Hubble Space Telescope said Wednesday, July 11, 2012, they have discovered the tiniest moon yet around Pluto. That brings the number of known moons to five. (AP Photo/NASA,File)